Schizophrenia is not one of them, but maybe they just don't want to talk about it. None of the five is easy to deal with. So that is kind of proof that they are the chosen tribe by God.
As for the conclusion in the rense.com saying that Jews are more likely to be crazy etc., I think it has been over played. Ashkenazi Jews are slightly more than half of Israel's Jewish population. only 1 in five carry mutated NDST3 in pairs (both father and mother has it) yet only they are only 40% more likely to get Schizophrenia. So this factor can explain some extreme behavior of some Israelis, but definitely not that Arabian Jew Alon Mizrahi. Intermarriage between tribes greatly reduces the chance of paired genetic mutations. I wonder if the Ashkenazi Jews have customs to encourage or tolerate inbreeding.
Allow me to describe another possibility. There was an Israeli Jew who happened to work with me as a colleague twice, in two different companies. We talked more often in the first encounter as we worked in a small start-up at the same site. He said that Many people born in Israel cannot live comfortably in Israel due to mental stress coming from being constantly on the brink of war or the need to keep that kind of mentality. These folks, he himself included, will apply for a US visa (or other nations) to work 3 years. The visa can be extended once for 6 years total. Then they have to return to Israel for at least one year before they can apply again. My second encounter with him was some time after he survived that one year in between and had come back to the US again. Imagine somebody in a war-like situation every day, when your fellow bus rider may carry a bomb. He said everybody riding a bus in Israel looks at everyone else all the time during the ride. Even people who don't have the NDST3 mutation will probably go nuts after a couple of years.
The core issue is why Israelis have to live this way. Since the days before Israel as a nation even existed, they have been living like this and used terror tactics to drive Palestinians away from their desired homeland. If they choose to treat everybody else as second-class, the same attitude will boomerang sooner or later.
I'll get back to your analysis OF the analysis. 😊 But first, before I do that, it's time for some necessary "fun." Now, I'm going to introduce RELIGIOUS and PROPHETIC perspectives that can be found in three scriptures of three different religions:
Judaism
Christianity
Islam.
And all three of those religions, with respect to prophecies about Bani Israel, aka, the Children of Israel, aka, the Hebrew-Israelites, aka, the "Jews," speak of either their rebelliousness, God's punishment against them, their banishment from the land, and/or their adoption of an identity that is not theirs. But before I do that, let's deal with a number of non-religious factors that are simply historical and that history itself, as well as elaboration by scholars, has unfolded before us all:
1.) The invention of Zionism, an invention that was made by GUESS WHO? By the direct influence, NOT of Ashkenazi Jews, but, rather, of three Christian movements, long before political Zionism existed: Puritanism, Millenialism, and Dispensationalism. On those influences, you can read Part 2 of a Substack series I wrote entitled, "Jesus Died in Kashmir at age 120." The Part 2 subtitle is, "The Role of Millenialism, Puritanism, Dispensationalism in the creation of Zionism."
2. The role of British colonialism in its desire to set up a proxy/client state, in the Middle East, which would serve British interests, those interests surrounding control of the Middle East's natural resorces, as well as serving as an extension of British and colonialist power
3. The role of the concept of the nation-state. The concept of the nation-state began to take shape in Europe during the early modern period, gaining prominence around the 17th and 18th centuries. It's often associated with the Westphalian system, established after the Thirty Years' War (1618-1648). This system emphasized state sovereignty and territorial boundaries, laying the groundwork for the modern nation-state.
European Jews had suffered persecution, in Europe, for a very long time. When the idea of the nation-state was birthed, formal Zionism saw an opportunity to remove POLITICAL JEWS from the pogroms, religious bias, etc., that they'd suffered. I assume you are aware that the early Zionist, Ashkenazi "founders" of Zionism were NOT religious. They were atheists, and felt that if Jews had their own nation, they would be respected by the the OTHER Euros. This fit perfectly with,
4. the BRITISH (and European) desire to accomplish two things: A.) Hopefully EMPTY Europe, which did not like Jews, of Jews, and, B.) Create that client state that would serve the interest of colonialism and imperialism, as I stated in #2 above.
5. Divide and conquer, as manifested by the secret Sykes-Picot agreement, a secret pact, which divided the Middle East region into British and French spheres of influence, leading to the creation of new states and mandates. Part of this was for the reason of "managing" the collapsing Ottoman Empire. But the PRINCIPLE of divide-and-conquer has always been the favorite tactic of the Euros for acquiring and maintaining power over others.
Okay, so here comes the scientific study that was exposed in that Rense.com video that I put up at Substack, and that you read. Sooooo, which one of the above five influence would you pick as "the" major influence on what's causing violence in that area, as well as causing the INSANE violence that Ashkenazi Jews are committing against Gazan AND West bank Palestinians; against Lebanon, against Syria, and, at one time or another in its history, against many of its other neighbors?
WHY is it that a people--in this case I'm talking about the total population of Jews on the planet, which is about 15,000,000 people--have had such CONSTANT problems, for THOUSANDS OF YEARS [if we accept the Ashkenazi claim that they are descended (they AIN'T) from the ancient Hebrew-Israelites? Which of the above five factors--six including, for sake of argument, the alleged pre-disposition to psycopathy that "Jews" have--would you say is the dominant factor that is causing their problems? Or, which COMBINATION of the above factors can be said to be "the" causes?
Well, in MY view, when there exist a people who have suffered expulsion from territories of this earth, and have suffered expulsion ONE-THOUSAND AND THIRTY-TIMES (1,030), some of those explusions occuring BEFORE CHRISTIANITY EXISTED, then, it seems to me, we need to look for some OTHER reason, under than the six reason that are listed abouve, including the issue of a supposed pre-disposition to psycopathy.
And I submit to you that I KNOW the underlying reasons: Punishment from God, a punishment promised to them, in THEIR OWN SCRIPTURE, the Torah, such as "The Curses" that are listed, in the Book of Deuteronomy, that it says that God would rain down on them IF they disobeyed. I CAN list them, but this comment is long enough.
Perhaps in another comment, I will refer you to Substack articles I wrote that DIRECTLY quote the verse of the TORAH, the verse of the QUR'AN, and verses in the CHRISTIAN NEW TESTAMENT, all of which prophecy, or speak of, God's ANGER against them. Hey, I didn't say it: THREE SCRIPTUES said it. I was born in 1950. I JUST got here.
Okay, what is my point. We can debate and argue about any of the above six factors that are part of the history of Bani Israel, including the claim of their having a pre-disposition towards psychopathy. But!! We're NOT talking about stuff that's happened only after the Second Aliyah, or any other modern period. We're talking about a pattern that has dogged their foodsteps FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS, long before Britain, Europe, or America existed.
So, MY true belief is as I've said: They are being persecuted NOT because Britain wanted to extend its colonial power and influence; NOT because Euros didn't like Jews; NOT because Arabs hate Jews [Arabs and Jews were getting along PERFECTLY before the Ashkenazi "Jews" arrived in Palestine, even marrying one another, as a couple of films of the time have shown]; but, rather; NOT because Jews have a pre-disposition towards psychopathy. And even if ALL of the above are true, NONE of them can explain the CENTURIES-LONG troubles that Bani Israel (the "Jews") have suffered.
I submit that that suffering came NOT from any external sources. The primary source of their suffering is THEMSELVES. And it goes back to an ancient HABIT they have of turning their backs on the Prophets that God sends them; making up their OWN books (such as the Talmud), and IGNORING what they were TOLD to do, in Torah, by God.
Remember when Moses went up the mountain to get The Law (The Ten Commandments?), according to THEIR scripture? What did they do while he was getting The Law from God? They were PARTYING, to use a modern term. They were disobeying Gods commands.
THAT is the root of their problems, not any of the above-listed things. The above-listend things are SYMPTOMS of problems that they caused THEMSELVES. They talk about "anti-semitism." Well, the BIGGEST anti-semites are Bani Israel, i.e., the Jews. They screw THEIR OWN lives up, and do so by disobeying God. Have you ever seen what goes on at the beaches in "The Holy Land?" Man, if I were immoral, I could fly there, and before ONE HOUR, I could "get in the ear" (sweet talk) one of those damn-near NAKED Jewish women, who are VIOLATING Torah by appearing damn-near naked in public; take her home, and get "down and dirty!!"
If God "chooses" you as his Chosen People, and then you F*CK UP, then guess what? You're in deep shit.
Anyway, I do not like to bring up the religious, prophetic issue, because people of the "modern" world general reject religious explanations. So, I use those six factors mention above to "explain" the problems that Bani Israel always manage to cause for themselves. But, again, the REAL reason for their travails is THEIR disobedience of the Laws of the Most High God, whom they call "Yah," or "Yahweh." There's the real answer.
I think I have read or thought of all the issues you cited, but not the theological part, and I never get close to the level of organization of these thoughts.
In the old days, I think nation-state, or the western-style "nationalism" was the cause. Yugoslav Civil War and African ethnic massacres enforced that thought. Once I went beyond 1973 Yom Kuppur War, I started to see that Israeli Jews can fight, but cannot run a nation. Then I started to see cultural bias and Israelis see themselves as best. Then I found that military victories alone cannot explain their erratic behavior. I concluded that their superiority complex comes from religion. And for Jews, religion cannot be separated from culture and custom, ditto for India. (In Buddhism-dominated countries, you need to separate them).
I finally saw Muhamud as a prophet, in a slightly different light than I see Jesus and Buda as prophets. Jews believe they are above all other people, and they are probably above God as well. Their ceremonies about pagan (?) faith are typical of primitive tribes and usually based on pragmatic concerns (I pray you and you bless me). This is very different from the faiths established eventually as Christianity, Buddhism, or Islam. As you cited the Ten Commandments example, Jews had committed to many sins for a reason they did not think hard enough. Jesus was entirely different because Jesus believed we are all created equal as children of God. Therefore, we are brothers and sisters. There should not be discrimination or exploitation of one's own blood relatives (but we know such examples are constantly available in history.) In this aspect, one of his students who was not a true believer, had to rebel. For Juda to believe in Jesus, he has to recognize himself as not being superior in any sense. not good.
Buda was born a Hindu prince and was deeply influenced by Hinduism. As you know, there are four castes. My classmates from India told me that the caste system is alive and well. A few of them, being one of the various "Kumars" (meaning God in Hindu) did show certain pride, if not the hubris, of being a "Kumar". Buda believed that was wrong. Buddhism believe all people are born equal, in the sense of no one is superior. Buda used incarnation and spiritual wealth/debt accumulated in previous lives to explain the starting point of life. One born in the palace is due to his past lives doing good. But if the prince does bad things in life, then even if he dies rich and high ages, his next life will be pain. This provided a relief to the majority of the poor mass. In comparison, Christianity can only teach followers to endure because when they die they will be in heaven, hence reduces the fear about pain and suffering.
Muhammad is different (mostly because I don't understand his ideas yet. He was born at a time when the West Roman Empire had been destroyed, and the East Roman Empire treated the modern Middle East more as frontier rather than the core of of the Empire. The rule of law and order was weak, the Middle East was more of the traditional tribal territory-and-conflict era. Muhammad was able to establish a common moral order out of the chaos. Such Moral orders must have universal values otherwise it cannot quickly propagate to Africa and Central Asia. The common nomadic lifestyle maybe one reason to allow him to formulate something everybody can understand and respect. Modern Westerners ridiculed Islam for allowing one man with 4 wives. But this was common in the ancient times, East and West, without a numerical limit. There is no counting as how many "wives" Louis XIV had, but most likely far fewer than typical Chinese emperors (usually 10+, not counting pure sexual relationship without ceremonies). Within my shallow knowledge, Muhammad wins my heart when I read from someone explaining that Muhammad does not like the concept of business lending. Between friends and relatives, one should just gift the money to someone in dire need. If there was no borrowing, none of the financial crisis in the last 300 years would have happened. I wonder if business lending is also an invention of the superior tribe.
Zionism is more of a Christian White's narrative to hire Jews as temple keepers. They look down on Jews (We white are the true superior tribes, unlike you Jews have no nation.) This is consistent of the speculation of the Anglo-Saxon power wanted to cut modern Israel out of the Muslim world, It was for the imperialism of Anglo-Saxon, not for the homeland of Jews. In this light, the Americans can never give up on Israel. The only way Israel can die is by committing suicide. I still cannot fully understand their desire to get punished so they can get their Messiah. I think that as more of a cover for Jewish imperialism. And if we try to look at how the Jews behave in daily life, Christian, Buddhists, or Muslim theologies and belief, then yes, the Jews have sinned badly. Sometimes I wonder if pedophile is also a Jewish tradition. There had been Jewish communities in China since the Tang dynasty (more than a thousand years ago) but Chinese historically don't get along with Jews.
Back to your original question. You think the most dominant reason for why Jewish people suffered all these years up to now is due to their own bad behavior. I agree. But then you have to ask why they behave badly without self examination (a key aspect in Chinese philosophy). I think it is the superiority complex. Since you showed that Jews committed all kinds of sins when Moses posted the Ten Commandments. I would say the Arabs before Muhammad committed similar sins. As do Chinese, Japanese, and all other tribes. To sin is human. Faith is one way to improve humans so as to commit fewer sins. In that aspect, the so-called Jewish Fundamentalists have not quite understood their own religious teaching, but that is because the religion, the ethnicity, and the culture are all merged into one. Given their tribal superiority complex and the culture of constantly sniping to acquire some tactical advantages here and there (in both battleground and business), there is no way they can really perceive the original religious teaching -- or their religious teaching cannot revert their superiority complex.
Sorry for the murmuring, but I have no other people in my circle to discuss religion objectively.
No need to apologize for sharing. There are specific reasons why I share:
1. Prophet Muhammad said, "When you see a wrong, stop it with your hand. If you can't stop it with your hand, then speak against it. And if you can't speak against it, then condemn it in your heart. Of those three choices, the last one is the weakest." Today, clearly, the biggest wrong being committed, right before the eyes of the entire world, is genocide. I can't stop it with my hand. So, I speak.
2. I embrace Islam as taught by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, formerly known as the Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam. The founder, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, said the following: "The Last Jihad [i.e., the last struggle] will be a Jihad of the pen, in which the hearts of humanity will be won over to peace and submission through communication and personal example."
Little could Hazrat Ahmad (1835-1908) have known that, one day, I-phones, notebook computers, laptop computers, desktop computers would exist, devices that we can use to send a message from Beijing to Chicago in a split second. I see his "Jihad of the pen" prophecy as having come true. You are engaged in the Jihad of the pen. I'm placing energy in the Jihad of the pen form of war, hoping that the end result of "soft" war will be peace. Well, leaving that aside I continue.
I need to add a seventh influence on the Zionist mentality. Remember, I listed six before. Here's the 7th: the influence of the development of race, racism, and racial supremacy. Zionism was developed right at the time that theories of race were being developed. Here are some of the people who were developing those theories, every single one of whom were Euros (Europeans, aka, whites):
Racial theory was huge during those periods. An Zionism fit right into that era. Racial theories were taught, in schools. Theories of race incorporated the idea of an "intellectual evolution," with Euros (whites) ending up, according to racial theory, being the ultimate manifesation of evolutionary intellectualism.
In the 1950s, I was a kid. I went to the main library of the Chicago library system, which was located in downtown Chicago. Back then, on the very last page of dictionaries, there was a chart called, "Hierarchy of the Races." Guess who was at the bottom? Guess who was at the top? Not a hard guess, right? LOL!!! 😊
So, such teachings were common, even up through the 1950s, but, by then, those teachings were wearing away. One of the reasons why the DUMBEST white guy felt superior to the SMARTEST black dude was because of the MIS-EDUCATION within the Western "educational" system.
So, in the case of Euro-Jews, the split between religious Jews and political Jews [Zionists] was, in part, I believe, based on the influence of the European racial theories of the time. And the only religious thing that appealed to Zionist Jews was the notion of being "The Chosen People of God."
Quite frankly, it would take a Jewish scholar to explain this stuff, and there are some AWESOME YouTube videos where such scholars are explaing this stuff, condemning Zionism, explaining the difference between RELIGIOUS Jews and POLITICAL, Zionist Jews. The Chosen People motif had conditions, given by God. They'd remain Chosen as long as the lived within the Laws of God.
But the Zionists USED the "Chosen People" motif as a reason to justify their brutality. And now, today, we don't even have to read ONE single history book, because, right before our eyes, by their actions, Zionlist leaders are claiming superiority. One Israeli leader, years ago, openly stated that Israel was "the white man's land." In the year 2012, former Israeli Interior Minister, Eli Yishai, said the following:
"Muslims that arrive here [Israel] do not even believe that this country belongs to us, TO THE WHITE MAN." You can check that out at this Substack article I wrote:
On the comments you made, you covered a lot. I'd be writing all day. But, I'll just say something about Islam. There is a verse of Qur'an that says, "The Jew, the Sabian, the Christian: Whichever from amongst these truly believes in Allah and the Last Day shall have his reward with his lord." That is ONE of the statements of Qur'an surrounding the issue of human brotherhood and equality.
The verse is not about what would be called "religious syncretism." That is, it's not the idea of, for example, Sanatana Dharma ("Hinduism") and Christianity combining to create a new religion. It's a verse about the equality of human beings, especiallin the Sight of God. There is no group that, by virtue "being Muslim" or "Being Jewish" or "Being Christian" rates one superior [or "Chosen"] over any other one.
The criteria is believe in God and a time when we will stand before God to account for how we, as my big brother would put it, "dealt out our hand" in this life. Qur'an also talks about righteousnes. Being righteous is something that anyone can be.
So, the "Chosen" people of God are NOT this one group called "Jews." The Chosen People of God are those people who live their beliefs.
It's almost SHOCKING the UTTER STUPIDITY of, for instance, Evangelical Christian Zionists. Oy vey!! Well, I won't "go there." I've written about them extensively.
Let's see....[I'm skimming your last comment]..... On polygamy: OH, BOY!!!!!!! An ex-girlfriend, whom I'd "coverted" to Islam, but we broke up and didn't get married [We're still friends] married someone else. He died. Years passed, and she called me, telling me how frustrated she was because men that dated her only wanted sex. And, being a Muslima (Muslim woman) she would not have sex before marriage.
I knew her very well, so I knew that she was giving me a hint. I TRIED to ignore it. I failed. Eventually, she kept putting the guilt trip (Well, sort of), telling me over and over again that, "I can't find a decent man!!" Oh, SHIT!! This was her hint about ME taking her on as a second wife. I was married already. Oy vey.
In Islam [If you're doing it RIGHT], you must get permission from your wife to taken on another wife. My wife did give that permission. So, I talk to my ex-girlfriend, and the arrangements were made. It DID NOT last. We were even going to be married by a Muslim friend of mine.
I won't go into details. I'll just say this: If anyone thinks that polygamy translates to some kind of sexual paradise, FORGET IT!!! Of course, my ex girlfriend and I did not have pre-martial sex. In Islam, whatever you provide for one wife, you must provide for the other. They CANNOT live in the same apartment or home. So, I'd have to find a building ahd rent TWO apartments, and go between wives as needed.
What does "go between wives as needed?" Lemme tell you the REAL deal: You're dealing with WOMEN. One is gonna call you and say, "The sink is leaking." She's LYING. She just wants your presence. This kind of thing, believe or not happened to Prophet Muhammad Himself. LOL!!! Women are WOMEN. And we're talking about women who were married to A PROPHET. Yet, they would do little conniving stuff.
Once, I told my wife, "I have to go pick up Salima" [that was not her real name], because she's late for her radio program that she heads." OH, BOY. My wife SLAMMED a metal container on the kitchen counter, turned to me, and said,.......Well, I won't say what she said. It was NOT nice. But, I had to pick the other woman I was engaged to up.
Well, this went on for a couple of months. Both I and the other woman, my ex-girlfriend, came to realize that we both had changed, over the years. So, we called it off. I can tell you some horror stories of dudes--right in Chicago--who took on more than one wife.
One dude was working his ASS off, working two jobs in order to take care of his THREE wives. One day, he came home from work--LATE. He opened the door to his place. All three of his wives had been waiting there, and immediately JUMP one him, beat the SHIT out of him, and he had to go to the hospital. LOL!!!!!!!!
I forgot what they were angry about. But, it AIN'T like dudes think. And Prophet Muhammad himself, as I said, did not escape. The fourth leader, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community said that, after growing up watching his dad, in Pakistan, juggling for wives, he concluded that NEVER would he have more than one wife.
During the life of Muhammad, if the Muslims were at war, and the males of the enemy were killed, the Muslim fighters could take on the women of the men they'd killed, the idea being to avoid those women going into prostitution or suffering. Polygamy was NOT meant to be some sexual pleasure trip. And, sometimes, those women had children.
War was bad enough. But, to leave women on their own, to fend for themselves, was a threat to the women themselves; to their children; and to the moral fabric of society. There was no compulsion. No Muslim man was forced to take on a wife.
MAYBE the ONLY woman I would want to take on as a wife would be Sophia Loren in her prime!!!!! (I have no problems with race when it comes to beautiful women. Just saying. 😊💃)
Just to throw a little yuk-yuk (laughter) into these exchanges, here is a Substack article I wrote on December 8, 2023:
Yah, that one man four wives business was only Muhammad's attempt to regulate the behavior of the tribal kings and noblemen. Not as a guideline for "you should". Jesus had to face Roman soldiers, but Muhammad had to face these kings and noblemen. Without their help, Muslim code could not have passed around fast enough. Muhammad was very pragmatic. Mongolian kings did keep multiple wives, usually each with her own palace and far away from other wives.
Well, after Muhammad died, the Arabs said, "Okay, he's gone now!!!" 😊 And some things were re-adopted, or changed. For instance, when Rassolulah (Muhammad) was alive, and congregational prayer was occurring, the men would be on one side of the room, the women would be ADJACENT to the men, on the otherside of the room, with an aisle in between.
For that time, this was a huge statement of the equality of men and women. Women were NOT forced to stand behind the men with a curtain between the men and women. But, after Muhammad died, in time they put the women behind the men, with a curtain in between.
And, of course, you've heard of the Ha'areem, i.e., the Harem. So, quite frankly, the deen (practice), or way of Islam become corrupted in some areas. But, no where near what happened to Christianity.
One thing I like about being Muslims is that, I can go to any country, walk into the Mosque on, for instance, Juma (Friday) congregational prayer, find the wuzu (ablution) area, perform my wuzu, join the prayer line when it's time. The prayers--no matter where on the planet--are recited in Arabic; the movements are exactly the same. I really like that.
One reason I like it is that, I was a pre-Vatican II Catholic for 14 years, from nursery school, to kindergarten, to elementary school, to high school. During all that time, the Catholic Holy Mass was the same wherever you went on the plant. Mass was conducted in Latin. As a Catholic, you automatically learn all the Latin prayers, etc.
There was this strong feeling of unity. You were part of "The Body of Christ," which meant the collective community of Catholics the world over. It was awesome. When I visited my mom, I didn't have to take the bus from 79th & South Park all the way to my Church at 49th & South Park. I could simply walk three blocks to St. Dorothy's Church, "celebrate" (as it was called) the Holy Mass. And I knew every single part of it.
But the Second Vatican Council, suddenly, started changing my beloved religion. For pre-Vatican II Catholics, this was horrifying. You cannot imagine how horrifying it was. By my Junior year in high school, I was an atheist. I remained atheist for eight years, then accepted Islam, converted by a friend of mine in college.
In Catholicism, we had the Pope, the "Representative of God on earth." On holidays like Christmas an Easter, the nuns at Corpus Christi Grammar School, the elementary school I attended, would make the announcement over the Intercom: "Good morning, children! The Holy Father wishes you a very Merry Christmas." Man, that was awesome!! Catholicism was VERY powerful. Then Vatican II BLEW IT.
There is now a fairly strong and growing attempt by today's young Catholics to recapture pre-1960s Catholicism. I think it's succeeding, to, even in Europe.
I keep up with that at TheRemnantVideo YouTube channel. Michael Matt, the content producer, is an awesome historial, as well as Traditionalist Catholic who, I'd say, is a global leader in the attempt to return Catholicism to Traditionalism. I won't go into this, but you would be surprised that the U.S. government is shaking it its boots, concerned about the revival of Traditionalism--a global community with ONE LEADER. Our secular government leaders around the world are not happy about such a possibility.
I keep up with it as if it's a footballl game. 😊 Here's TheRemnant Video's channel:
Here is a related link from the info cited in the rense.com video. https://www.gaucherdisease.org/blog/5-common-ashkenazi-genetic-diseases/
Schizophrenia is not one of them, but maybe they just don't want to talk about it. None of the five is easy to deal with. So that is kind of proof that they are the chosen tribe by God.
As for the conclusion in the rense.com saying that Jews are more likely to be crazy etc., I think it has been over played. Ashkenazi Jews are slightly more than half of Israel's Jewish population. only 1 in five carry mutated NDST3 in pairs (both father and mother has it) yet only they are only 40% more likely to get Schizophrenia. So this factor can explain some extreme behavior of some Israelis, but definitely not that Arabian Jew Alon Mizrahi. Intermarriage between tribes greatly reduces the chance of paired genetic mutations. I wonder if the Ashkenazi Jews have customs to encourage or tolerate inbreeding.
Allow me to describe another possibility. There was an Israeli Jew who happened to work with me as a colleague twice, in two different companies. We talked more often in the first encounter as we worked in a small start-up at the same site. He said that Many people born in Israel cannot live comfortably in Israel due to mental stress coming from being constantly on the brink of war or the need to keep that kind of mentality. These folks, he himself included, will apply for a US visa (or other nations) to work 3 years. The visa can be extended once for 6 years total. Then they have to return to Israel for at least one year before they can apply again. My second encounter with him was some time after he survived that one year in between and had come back to the US again. Imagine somebody in a war-like situation every day, when your fellow bus rider may carry a bomb. He said everybody riding a bus in Israel looks at everyone else all the time during the ride. Even people who don't have the NDST3 mutation will probably go nuts after a couple of years.
The core issue is why Israelis have to live this way. Since the days before Israel as a nation even existed, they have been living like this and used terror tactics to drive Palestinians away from their desired homeland. If they choose to treat everybody else as second-class, the same attitude will boomerang sooner or later.
I'll get back to your analysis OF the analysis. 😊 But first, before I do that, it's time for some necessary "fun." Now, I'm going to introduce RELIGIOUS and PROPHETIC perspectives that can be found in three scriptures of three different religions:
Judaism
Christianity
Islam.
And all three of those religions, with respect to prophecies about Bani Israel, aka, the Children of Israel, aka, the Hebrew-Israelites, aka, the "Jews," speak of either their rebelliousness, God's punishment against them, their banishment from the land, and/or their adoption of an identity that is not theirs. But before I do that, let's deal with a number of non-religious factors that are simply historical and that history itself, as well as elaboration by scholars, has unfolded before us all:
1.) The invention of Zionism, an invention that was made by GUESS WHO? By the direct influence, NOT of Ashkenazi Jews, but, rather, of three Christian movements, long before political Zionism existed: Puritanism, Millenialism, and Dispensationalism. On those influences, you can read Part 2 of a Substack series I wrote entitled, "Jesus Died in Kashmir at age 120." The Part 2 subtitle is, "The Role of Millenialism, Puritanism, Dispensationalism in the creation of Zionism."
https://ronchism.substack.com/p/part-2-jesus-died-in-kashmir-at-age?utm_source=publication-search
2. The role of British colonialism in its desire to set up a proxy/client state, in the Middle East, which would serve British interests, those interests surrounding control of the Middle East's natural resorces, as well as serving as an extension of British and colonialist power
3. The role of the concept of the nation-state. The concept of the nation-state began to take shape in Europe during the early modern period, gaining prominence around the 17th and 18th centuries. It's often associated with the Westphalian system, established after the Thirty Years' War (1618-1648). This system emphasized state sovereignty and territorial boundaries, laying the groundwork for the modern nation-state.
European Jews had suffered persecution, in Europe, for a very long time. When the idea of the nation-state was birthed, formal Zionism saw an opportunity to remove POLITICAL JEWS from the pogroms, religious bias, etc., that they'd suffered. I assume you are aware that the early Zionist, Ashkenazi "founders" of Zionism were NOT religious. They were atheists, and felt that if Jews had their own nation, they would be respected by the the OTHER Euros. This fit perfectly with,
4. the BRITISH (and European) desire to accomplish two things: A.) Hopefully EMPTY Europe, which did not like Jews, of Jews, and, B.) Create that client state that would serve the interest of colonialism and imperialism, as I stated in #2 above.
5. Divide and conquer, as manifested by the secret Sykes-Picot agreement, a secret pact, which divided the Middle East region into British and French spheres of influence, leading to the creation of new states and mandates. Part of this was for the reason of "managing" the collapsing Ottoman Empire. But the PRINCIPLE of divide-and-conquer has always been the favorite tactic of the Euros for acquiring and maintaining power over others.
Okay, so here comes the scientific study that was exposed in that Rense.com video that I put up at Substack, and that you read. Sooooo, which one of the above five influence would you pick as "the" major influence on what's causing violence in that area, as well as causing the INSANE violence that Ashkenazi Jews are committing against Gazan AND West bank Palestinians; against Lebanon, against Syria, and, at one time or another in its history, against many of its other neighbors?
WHY is it that a people--in this case I'm talking about the total population of Jews on the planet, which is about 15,000,000 people--have had such CONSTANT problems, for THOUSANDS OF YEARS [if we accept the Ashkenazi claim that they are descended (they AIN'T) from the ancient Hebrew-Israelites? Which of the above five factors--six including, for sake of argument, the alleged pre-disposition to psycopathy that "Jews" have--would you say is the dominant factor that is causing their problems? Or, which COMBINATION of the above factors can be said to be "the" causes?
Well, in MY view, when there exist a people who have suffered expulsion from territories of this earth, and have suffered expulsion ONE-THOUSAND AND THIRTY-TIMES (1,030), some of those explusions occuring BEFORE CHRISTIANITY EXISTED, then, it seems to me, we need to look for some OTHER reason, under than the six reason that are listed abouve, including the issue of a supposed pre-disposition to psycopathy.
And I submit to you that I KNOW the underlying reasons: Punishment from God, a punishment promised to them, in THEIR OWN SCRIPTURE, the Torah, such as "The Curses" that are listed, in the Book of Deuteronomy, that it says that God would rain down on them IF they disobeyed. I CAN list them, but this comment is long enough.
Perhaps in another comment, I will refer you to Substack articles I wrote that DIRECTLY quote the verse of the TORAH, the verse of the QUR'AN, and verses in the CHRISTIAN NEW TESTAMENT, all of which prophecy, or speak of, God's ANGER against them. Hey, I didn't say it: THREE SCRIPTUES said it. I was born in 1950. I JUST got here.
Okay, what is my point. We can debate and argue about any of the above six factors that are part of the history of Bani Israel, including the claim of their having a pre-disposition towards psychopathy. But!! We're NOT talking about stuff that's happened only after the Second Aliyah, or any other modern period. We're talking about a pattern that has dogged their foodsteps FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS, long before Britain, Europe, or America existed.
So, MY true belief is as I've said: They are being persecuted NOT because Britain wanted to extend its colonial power and influence; NOT because Euros didn't like Jews; NOT because Arabs hate Jews [Arabs and Jews were getting along PERFECTLY before the Ashkenazi "Jews" arrived in Palestine, even marrying one another, as a couple of films of the time have shown]; but, rather; NOT because Jews have a pre-disposition towards psychopathy. And even if ALL of the above are true, NONE of them can explain the CENTURIES-LONG troubles that Bani Israel (the "Jews") have suffered.
I submit that that suffering came NOT from any external sources. The primary source of their suffering is THEMSELVES. And it goes back to an ancient HABIT they have of turning their backs on the Prophets that God sends them; making up their OWN books (such as the Talmud), and IGNORING what they were TOLD to do, in Torah, by God.
Remember when Moses went up the mountain to get The Law (The Ten Commandments?), according to THEIR scripture? What did they do while he was getting The Law from God? They were PARTYING, to use a modern term. They were disobeying Gods commands.
THAT is the root of their problems, not any of the above-listed things. The above-listend things are SYMPTOMS of problems that they caused THEMSELVES. They talk about "anti-semitism." Well, the BIGGEST anti-semites are Bani Israel, i.e., the Jews. They screw THEIR OWN lives up, and do so by disobeying God. Have you ever seen what goes on at the beaches in "The Holy Land?" Man, if I were immoral, I could fly there, and before ONE HOUR, I could "get in the ear" (sweet talk) one of those damn-near NAKED Jewish women, who are VIOLATING Torah by appearing damn-near naked in public; take her home, and get "down and dirty!!"
If God "chooses" you as his Chosen People, and then you F*CK UP, then guess what? You're in deep shit.
Anyway, I do not like to bring up the religious, prophetic issue, because people of the "modern" world general reject religious explanations. So, I use those six factors mention above to "explain" the problems that Bani Israel always manage to cause for themselves. But, again, the REAL reason for their travails is THEIR disobedience of the Laws of the Most High God, whom they call "Yah," or "Yahweh." There's the real answer.
I think I have read or thought of all the issues you cited, but not the theological part, and I never get close to the level of organization of these thoughts.
In the old days, I think nation-state, or the western-style "nationalism" was the cause. Yugoslav Civil War and African ethnic massacres enforced that thought. Once I went beyond 1973 Yom Kuppur War, I started to see that Israeli Jews can fight, but cannot run a nation. Then I started to see cultural bias and Israelis see themselves as best. Then I found that military victories alone cannot explain their erratic behavior. I concluded that their superiority complex comes from religion. And for Jews, religion cannot be separated from culture and custom, ditto for India. (In Buddhism-dominated countries, you need to separate them).
I finally saw Muhamud as a prophet, in a slightly different light than I see Jesus and Buda as prophets. Jews believe they are above all other people, and they are probably above God as well. Their ceremonies about pagan (?) faith are typical of primitive tribes and usually based on pragmatic concerns (I pray you and you bless me). This is very different from the faiths established eventually as Christianity, Buddhism, or Islam. As you cited the Ten Commandments example, Jews had committed to many sins for a reason they did not think hard enough. Jesus was entirely different because Jesus believed we are all created equal as children of God. Therefore, we are brothers and sisters. There should not be discrimination or exploitation of one's own blood relatives (but we know such examples are constantly available in history.) In this aspect, one of his students who was not a true believer, had to rebel. For Juda to believe in Jesus, he has to recognize himself as not being superior in any sense. not good.
Buda was born a Hindu prince and was deeply influenced by Hinduism. As you know, there are four castes. My classmates from India told me that the caste system is alive and well. A few of them, being one of the various "Kumars" (meaning God in Hindu) did show certain pride, if not the hubris, of being a "Kumar". Buda believed that was wrong. Buddhism believe all people are born equal, in the sense of no one is superior. Buda used incarnation and spiritual wealth/debt accumulated in previous lives to explain the starting point of life. One born in the palace is due to his past lives doing good. But if the prince does bad things in life, then even if he dies rich and high ages, his next life will be pain. This provided a relief to the majority of the poor mass. In comparison, Christianity can only teach followers to endure because when they die they will be in heaven, hence reduces the fear about pain and suffering.
Muhammad is different (mostly because I don't understand his ideas yet. He was born at a time when the West Roman Empire had been destroyed, and the East Roman Empire treated the modern Middle East more as frontier rather than the core of of the Empire. The rule of law and order was weak, the Middle East was more of the traditional tribal territory-and-conflict era. Muhammad was able to establish a common moral order out of the chaos. Such Moral orders must have universal values otherwise it cannot quickly propagate to Africa and Central Asia. The common nomadic lifestyle maybe one reason to allow him to formulate something everybody can understand and respect. Modern Westerners ridiculed Islam for allowing one man with 4 wives. But this was common in the ancient times, East and West, without a numerical limit. There is no counting as how many "wives" Louis XIV had, but most likely far fewer than typical Chinese emperors (usually 10+, not counting pure sexual relationship without ceremonies). Within my shallow knowledge, Muhammad wins my heart when I read from someone explaining that Muhammad does not like the concept of business lending. Between friends and relatives, one should just gift the money to someone in dire need. If there was no borrowing, none of the financial crisis in the last 300 years would have happened. I wonder if business lending is also an invention of the superior tribe.
Zionism is more of a Christian White's narrative to hire Jews as temple keepers. They look down on Jews (We white are the true superior tribes, unlike you Jews have no nation.) This is consistent of the speculation of the Anglo-Saxon power wanted to cut modern Israel out of the Muslim world, It was for the imperialism of Anglo-Saxon, not for the homeland of Jews. In this light, the Americans can never give up on Israel. The only way Israel can die is by committing suicide. I still cannot fully understand their desire to get punished so they can get their Messiah. I think that as more of a cover for Jewish imperialism. And if we try to look at how the Jews behave in daily life, Christian, Buddhists, or Muslim theologies and belief, then yes, the Jews have sinned badly. Sometimes I wonder if pedophile is also a Jewish tradition. There had been Jewish communities in China since the Tang dynasty (more than a thousand years ago) but Chinese historically don't get along with Jews.
Back to your original question. You think the most dominant reason for why Jewish people suffered all these years up to now is due to their own bad behavior. I agree. But then you have to ask why they behave badly without self examination (a key aspect in Chinese philosophy). I think it is the superiority complex. Since you showed that Jews committed all kinds of sins when Moses posted the Ten Commandments. I would say the Arabs before Muhammad committed similar sins. As do Chinese, Japanese, and all other tribes. To sin is human. Faith is one way to improve humans so as to commit fewer sins. In that aspect, the so-called Jewish Fundamentalists have not quite understood their own religious teaching, but that is because the religion, the ethnicity, and the culture are all merged into one. Given their tribal superiority complex and the culture of constantly sniping to acquire some tactical advantages here and there (in both battleground and business), there is no way they can really perceive the original religious teaching -- or their religious teaching cannot revert their superiority complex.
Sorry for the murmuring, but I have no other people in my circle to discuss religion objectively.
No need to apologize for sharing. There are specific reasons why I share:
1. Prophet Muhammad said, "When you see a wrong, stop it with your hand. If you can't stop it with your hand, then speak against it. And if you can't speak against it, then condemn it in your heart. Of those three choices, the last one is the weakest." Today, clearly, the biggest wrong being committed, right before the eyes of the entire world, is genocide. I can't stop it with my hand. So, I speak.
2. I embrace Islam as taught by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, formerly known as the Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam. The founder, Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, said the following: "The Last Jihad [i.e., the last struggle] will be a Jihad of the pen, in which the hearts of humanity will be won over to peace and submission through communication and personal example."
Little could Hazrat Ahmad (1835-1908) have known that, one day, I-phones, notebook computers, laptop computers, desktop computers would exist, devices that we can use to send a message from Beijing to Chicago in a split second. I see his "Jihad of the pen" prophecy as having come true. You are engaged in the Jihad of the pen. I'm placing energy in the Jihad of the pen form of war, hoping that the end result of "soft" war will be peace. Well, leaving that aside I continue.
I need to add a seventh influence on the Zionist mentality. Remember, I listed six before. Here's the 7th: the influence of the development of race, racism, and racial supremacy. Zionism was developed right at the time that theories of race were being developed. Here are some of the people who were developing those theories, every single one of whom were Euros (Europeans, aka, whites):
Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778)
Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752-1840)
Charles Darwin (1809-1882)
Sir Francis Galton (1822-1911)
Madison Grant (1865-1937)
Dr. Lothrop Stoddard (1883-1950)
I have very brief summaries of them here:
https://ronchism.substack.com/p/part-19-and-final-is-this-black-enough?utm_source=publication-search
Racial theory was huge during those periods. An Zionism fit right into that era. Racial theories were taught, in schools. Theories of race incorporated the idea of an "intellectual evolution," with Euros (whites) ending up, according to racial theory, being the ultimate manifesation of evolutionary intellectualism.
In the 1950s, I was a kid. I went to the main library of the Chicago library system, which was located in downtown Chicago. Back then, on the very last page of dictionaries, there was a chart called, "Hierarchy of the Races." Guess who was at the bottom? Guess who was at the top? Not a hard guess, right? LOL!!! 😊
So, such teachings were common, even up through the 1950s, but, by then, those teachings were wearing away. One of the reasons why the DUMBEST white guy felt superior to the SMARTEST black dude was because of the MIS-EDUCATION within the Western "educational" system.
So, in the case of Euro-Jews, the split between religious Jews and political Jews [Zionists] was, in part, I believe, based on the influence of the European racial theories of the time. And the only religious thing that appealed to Zionist Jews was the notion of being "The Chosen People of God."
Quite frankly, it would take a Jewish scholar to explain this stuff, and there are some AWESOME YouTube videos where such scholars are explaing this stuff, condemning Zionism, explaining the difference between RELIGIOUS Jews and POLITICAL, Zionist Jews. The Chosen People motif had conditions, given by God. They'd remain Chosen as long as the lived within the Laws of God.
But the Zionists USED the "Chosen People" motif as a reason to justify their brutality. And now, today, we don't even have to read ONE single history book, because, right before our eyes, by their actions, Zionlist leaders are claiming superiority. One Israeli leader, years ago, openly stated that Israel was "the white man's land." In the year 2012, former Israeli Interior Minister, Eli Yishai, said the following:
"Muslims that arrive here [Israel] do not even believe that this country belongs to us, TO THE WHITE MAN." You can check that out at this Substack article I wrote:
https://ronchism.substack.com/p/is-israel-the-last-white-supremacist?utm_source=publication-search
On the comments you made, you covered a lot. I'd be writing all day. But, I'll just say something about Islam. There is a verse of Qur'an that says, "The Jew, the Sabian, the Christian: Whichever from amongst these truly believes in Allah and the Last Day shall have his reward with his lord." That is ONE of the statements of Qur'an surrounding the issue of human brotherhood and equality.
The verse is not about what would be called "religious syncretism." That is, it's not the idea of, for example, Sanatana Dharma ("Hinduism") and Christianity combining to create a new religion. It's a verse about the equality of human beings, especiallin the Sight of God. There is no group that, by virtue "being Muslim" or "Being Jewish" or "Being Christian" rates one superior [or "Chosen"] over any other one.
The criteria is believe in God and a time when we will stand before God to account for how we, as my big brother would put it, "dealt out our hand" in this life. Qur'an also talks about righteousnes. Being righteous is something that anyone can be.
So, the "Chosen" people of God are NOT this one group called "Jews." The Chosen People of God are those people who live their beliefs.
It's almost SHOCKING the UTTER STUPIDITY of, for instance, Evangelical Christian Zionists. Oy vey!! Well, I won't "go there." I've written about them extensively.
Let's see....[I'm skimming your last comment]..... On polygamy: OH, BOY!!!!!!! An ex-girlfriend, whom I'd "coverted" to Islam, but we broke up and didn't get married [We're still friends] married someone else. He died. Years passed, and she called me, telling me how frustrated she was because men that dated her only wanted sex. And, being a Muslima (Muslim woman) she would not have sex before marriage.
I knew her very well, so I knew that she was giving me a hint. I TRIED to ignore it. I failed. Eventually, she kept putting the guilt trip (Well, sort of), telling me over and over again that, "I can't find a decent man!!" Oh, SHIT!! This was her hint about ME taking her on as a second wife. I was married already. Oy vey.
In Islam [If you're doing it RIGHT], you must get permission from your wife to taken on another wife. My wife did give that permission. So, I talk to my ex-girlfriend, and the arrangements were made. It DID NOT last. We were even going to be married by a Muslim friend of mine.
I won't go into details. I'll just say this: If anyone thinks that polygamy translates to some kind of sexual paradise, FORGET IT!!! Of course, my ex girlfriend and I did not have pre-martial sex. In Islam, whatever you provide for one wife, you must provide for the other. They CANNOT live in the same apartment or home. So, I'd have to find a building ahd rent TWO apartments, and go between wives as needed.
What does "go between wives as needed?" Lemme tell you the REAL deal: You're dealing with WOMEN. One is gonna call you and say, "The sink is leaking." She's LYING. She just wants your presence. This kind of thing, believe or not happened to Prophet Muhammad Himself. LOL!!! Women are WOMEN. And we're talking about women who were married to A PROPHET. Yet, they would do little conniving stuff.
Once, I told my wife, "I have to go pick up Salima" [that was not her real name], because she's late for her radio program that she heads." OH, BOY. My wife SLAMMED a metal container on the kitchen counter, turned to me, and said,.......Well, I won't say what she said. It was NOT nice. But, I had to pick the other woman I was engaged to up.
Well, this went on for a couple of months. Both I and the other woman, my ex-girlfriend, came to realize that we both had changed, over the years. So, we called it off. I can tell you some horror stories of dudes--right in Chicago--who took on more than one wife.
One dude was working his ASS off, working two jobs in order to take care of his THREE wives. One day, he came home from work--LATE. He opened the door to his place. All three of his wives had been waiting there, and immediately JUMP one him, beat the SHIT out of him, and he had to go to the hospital. LOL!!!!!!!!
I forgot what they were angry about. But, it AIN'T like dudes think. And Prophet Muhammad himself, as I said, did not escape. The fourth leader, Mirza Tahir Ahmad, of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community said that, after growing up watching his dad, in Pakistan, juggling for wives, he concluded that NEVER would he have more than one wife.
During the life of Muhammad, if the Muslims were at war, and the males of the enemy were killed, the Muslim fighters could take on the women of the men they'd killed, the idea being to avoid those women going into prostitution or suffering. Polygamy was NOT meant to be some sexual pleasure trip. And, sometimes, those women had children.
War was bad enough. But, to leave women on their own, to fend for themselves, was a threat to the women themselves; to their children; and to the moral fabric of society. There was no compulsion. No Muslim man was forced to take on a wife.
MAYBE the ONLY woman I would want to take on as a wife would be Sophia Loren in her prime!!!!! (I have no problems with race when it comes to beautiful women. Just saying. 😊💃)
Just to throw a little yuk-yuk (laughter) into these exchanges, here is a Substack article I wrote on December 8, 2023:
https://ronchism.substack.com/p/the-white-man-is-the-devil-elijah?utm_source=publication-search
Yeah, with Sophia Loren, in her prime, I'd try polygamy in a HEARTBEAT!!!!!!!!!! (Black women would call me "brainwashed." Okay, GUILTY AS CHARGED!!)
Yah, that one man four wives business was only Muhammad's attempt to regulate the behavior of the tribal kings and noblemen. Not as a guideline for "you should". Jesus had to face Roman soldiers, but Muhammad had to face these kings and noblemen. Without their help, Muslim code could not have passed around fast enough. Muhammad was very pragmatic. Mongolian kings did keep multiple wives, usually each with her own palace and far away from other wives.
Well, after Muhammad died, the Arabs said, "Okay, he's gone now!!!" 😊 And some things were re-adopted, or changed. For instance, when Rassolulah (Muhammad) was alive, and congregational prayer was occurring, the men would be on one side of the room, the women would be ADJACENT to the men, on the otherside of the room, with an aisle in between.
For that time, this was a huge statement of the equality of men and women. Women were NOT forced to stand behind the men with a curtain between the men and women. But, after Muhammad died, in time they put the women behind the men, with a curtain in between.
And, of course, you've heard of the Ha'areem, i.e., the Harem. So, quite frankly, the deen (practice), or way of Islam become corrupted in some areas. But, no where near what happened to Christianity.
One thing I like about being Muslims is that, I can go to any country, walk into the Mosque on, for instance, Juma (Friday) congregational prayer, find the wuzu (ablution) area, perform my wuzu, join the prayer line when it's time. The prayers--no matter where on the planet--are recited in Arabic; the movements are exactly the same. I really like that.
One reason I like it is that, I was a pre-Vatican II Catholic for 14 years, from nursery school, to kindergarten, to elementary school, to high school. During all that time, the Catholic Holy Mass was the same wherever you went on the plant. Mass was conducted in Latin. As a Catholic, you automatically learn all the Latin prayers, etc.
There was this strong feeling of unity. You were part of "The Body of Christ," which meant the collective community of Catholics the world over. It was awesome. When I visited my mom, I didn't have to take the bus from 79th & South Park all the way to my Church at 49th & South Park. I could simply walk three blocks to St. Dorothy's Church, "celebrate" (as it was called) the Holy Mass. And I knew every single part of it.
But the Second Vatican Council, suddenly, started changing my beloved religion. For pre-Vatican II Catholics, this was horrifying. You cannot imagine how horrifying it was. By my Junior year in high school, I was an atheist. I remained atheist for eight years, then accepted Islam, converted by a friend of mine in college.
In Catholicism, we had the Pope, the "Representative of God on earth." On holidays like Christmas an Easter, the nuns at Corpus Christi Grammar School, the elementary school I attended, would make the announcement over the Intercom: "Good morning, children! The Holy Father wishes you a very Merry Christmas." Man, that was awesome!! Catholicism was VERY powerful. Then Vatican II BLEW IT.
There is now a fairly strong and growing attempt by today's young Catholics to recapture pre-1960s Catholicism. I think it's succeeding, to, even in Europe.
I keep up with that at TheRemnantVideo YouTube channel. Michael Matt, the content producer, is an awesome historial, as well as Traditionalist Catholic who, I'd say, is a global leader in the attempt to return Catholicism to Traditionalism. I won't go into this, but you would be surprised that the U.S. government is shaking it its boots, concerned about the revival of Traditionalism--a global community with ONE LEADER. Our secular government leaders around the world are not happy about such a possibility.
I keep up with it as if it's a footballl game. 😊 Here's TheRemnant Video's channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@TheRemnantvideo/videos
And here's Matt's latest full-length video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdk4yk-9Aig